I have never had cable and it has been five months since I have watched TV at home. I feel better, more structured, and in-control in TV's absence. One of the prime reasons for not watching TV is the inability to relate to the content or the characters. Being a first generation East Indian in the USA comes with a premium: conformity issues at being subject to verbal, visual and subliminal messages crafted after careful market research and segmentation.
Driven by corporate structure, ratings, and revenue, the difference between entertainment, reality and information has almost vanished. I have always felt more taxed as I watched TV; perhaps the biggest outcome of corporate driven media is the mindset that it permeates amongst its viewers. This mindset creates undocumented social norms, prejudices, and values. The mindset builds over time and our neural networks get tuned to it as the images drive us into a softer/addictive state of mind leading us into a vicious cycle of thought. If not being able to see any decent desi portrayals was one reason, the effort in my mind to counterbalance the blatant political correctness and formulaic portrayal of characters based on the actor's ethnicity or background worsen it further. The most disgusting of them all is the apathy the media subculture creates in terms of regurgitated commentary where one talking head parrots stuff stolen from another talking head and presents them with polished vocabulary; not to mention the promotion of a certain flavor of English language that is defensive, stiff and confusing when used in real life situations.
Conan O'Brien is probably one of the most gifted on-screen anchors on TV. Conan once commented on Charlie Rose's show about the necessity of on-screen energy and animation on TV today, this energy according to him, is created via camera movements, on-screen antics, body language and graphics. These assault the mind in a way that it heightens your senses very artificially.
With Radio, youtube, Google, and RSS, a lot of the noise could be removed as it promotes cleaner and leaner content with due respect to the intelligence and time of the audience involved. I am not suggesting that all user-generated content out there is cerebral and classy but the bottom line is that there is no hidden agenda behind the content. It probably makes it more honest. Even if some faction were to use youtube or RSS to feed nonsense, people can smell it. You can fool people only for so long. With TV, it's unabashedly biased, there is nothing you can do about it. Case in point: name any of the alphabet soup channels. Even PBS has been hijacked; essentially, where there is structure and leverage, there is room for fishy business. Probably, there shouldn't be any structure to organizations that disseminate news, commentary or content that influences kids. On the contrary, ephemeral pools of news sources should coalesce into news organizations.
My beliefs were further strengthened when I heard about Jennifer Richeson on the radio. Jennifer, a 2006 MacArthur fellow is a social psychologist and an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology at Northwestern University. She has a very striking observation that corroborates with the "taxing" feeling I get when I watch TV. The slight difference is that there is subtle prejudice already in front of my eyes and therefore the mind has to combat twice the amount of prejudice, mine as well as what I see on TV.
A key finding of her work is that such interactions require heightened self-control to combat expressions of prejudice, calling on increased cognitive effort and resulting in decreased effectiveness on other cognitive tasks. Her work provides a novel way of examining and calculating the “costs” associated with intergroup interactions.