Archive for the 'National' Category

Fuzzy Penal Code

The latest in the saga of babudom vs. bloggers is the treatment meted out to Rashmi Bansal, the editor of Jam magazine. As one reads the report in Hindustan "Tabloid" Times, one gets a feeling that there is an army of lawyers probably recruited by the likes of Slimes of India, IIPM and other assorted media types waiting with bated breath to pounce on the first instance of incongruence with IPC

I generally do not believe any report put forth by the Indian media until and unless I am absolutely sure simply because the quality of reporting is almost "he-said, she-said" style without any depth, research or continuity. 

Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Enforcement, Sanjay Mohite told HT on Sunday that Bansal could not be traced at her office at Prabhadevi or her residence at Navi Mumbai after when officers from the department went searching for her after the offense was registered under section 292 and 295 (a), a non bailable offense

Here we have Rashmi supposedly missing in action because some lawyer recruit out there found something that did not quite tally with the IPC verbiage; thereby, the fuzzy penal code laws as read in article 292a, have to be brought in full force. This is nothing but an exploitation of loose verbiage and semantics that leaves back doors for those in power to argue and haggle.

Gaurav Sabnis dissects the verbiage to separate the fluff from the stuff and I agree with him that this is not a freedom-of-speech issue considering that JAM has issued an apology.

 295A: Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of 146[citizens of India], 147[by words, either spoken...

The keywords in the above clause being deliberate and malicious which were not Rashmi's intentions.

Related:- [Mailing list etiquette]- [Times are a changin…]- [koders.com barking up the wrong tree?]- [Connection Pooling]- [Your electronic device is watching you]

The Toilet Paper is on a roll

What can I say, The Toilet Paper never ceases to amaze me. I might have clicked the disgusting site probably five times in the last twelve months. Even the TOI servers must be groaning, “Oh God!” as they serve up crap, sparking interesting studies in news-to-crap ratios.

I digress, but considering that it is the weekend, and the Toilet Paper has come to our attention once again for all the wrong reasons, I cannot but comment on this Bennett, Coleman entity getting its panties in a bunch via the commentary by some guy named Shobhan Saxena.

Having said that, I have got to admit, this is one of those rare instances where we get to see a name associated with verbiage in the Toilet Paper of India. Most of the time, contributions do not have names; probably due to fear of criticism from readers. I still doubt if this Shobhan Saxena exists or if this is a name conjured out of thin air just to make stuff appear credible.

Without further ado, here is the clinical dissection:

Everyone has a story to tell, but everyone is not a natural-born storyteller.

The piece opens with a very silly rant, precisely the type he is accusing others of doing. Right off the bat, one can say the guy does not have the faintest idea of what blogs are or why people blog in general*. What else can we expect from an entity that wimped out and blocked Pradyuman Maheshwari?

They are interesting people. They think that they have something to say. They want to be read and heard and seen. But their aspiration is blocked by the obnoxious monster called the Editor and their high-voltage facts mixed with slam-dunk fiction, with a lot of typos and commas and semi-colons in wrong places, go down a drain called the Editorial Process.

The man basically wants to edit and educate us about our typos and such. Shobhan, Welcome to the blogosphere. I presume, the babu mindset is kicking and screaming inside you. It is not your fault, it is the conditioning that we all have been subjected to. In India, we are somehow made to feel that we are entitled to stuff by default. The crybabies at these Indian media outlets are nothing but extensions of political power; propaganda machines so to speak. Case in point: NDTV’s foray into the blogosphere. When a disruptor such as a blog enters the scene, media establishments kick and scream.

Forget wrong grammar and bad spellings, bloggers are now writing murders on the web.

That’s right. When the Indian government blocks blogs en masse or when there is a tsunami or when the Toilet Paper provides the list of most famous NRI baby names for the year as a top 10 news-item as terrorists blow up people in Kashmir, the need of the hour is clean text, sans the typos and such. Yes, blogosphere should be run by grammar Nazis. I cannot bear the mobile text lingo and it grinds my gears as much as it does for any sane person but to complain that blogs don’t follow the rules of grammar takes the cake.

It’s good fun, but this is no journalism. Learning and mastering good journalism is tough. You learn it in libraries, on flooded streets, in front of a rioting mob, in the middle of crossfire between a militia and a military, in war trenches, in the corridors of power and in the hamlets of deprivation. Sometimes, a reporter walks for miles in an area ravaged by a tsunami to get one quote from the man hanging on to a tree for a week.

Blogging can take the guise of journalism but all bloggers aren’t journalists. Blogging is a new dimension in the aspect of “freedom-of-speech.” People in general have the right to say what they feel irrespective of the language or the semantics thereof. Just because they don’t earn a living by reporting does not mean they do not have a say or should not broadcast how they feel.

For the first time since the idea of democracy took shape, blogging has provided a way for the general public to opine and let their voice known without fear of persecution. Before the advent of the Internet, Town hall or the Panchayat meetings were the closest one could think of but opinion in a Town hall meeting setup can still be swayed by force or hijacked by sheer strength in number or decibel level. Blogs are immune to such force and are extremely helpful in letting a point of view known in oppressive states such as Iran, China, Pakistan and to a certain extent, India.

Eager to make quick bucks, many have already boarded the train of paid bloggers, blowing away their claims of citizen-generated media, free from the restrictions of top-down “old media”.

The blogosphere is a self healing system. The lack of top-down control is one of the key strengths of the Blogosphere. Every blogger is a potential whistle-blower unlike an organization bound by protocol; so, by that rationale, one need not worry about credibility. Even if someone were to generate propaganda, it won’t be for long. Considering the omnipresence and penetration of the Internet, the people behind the propaganda will be exposed within days if not hours.

In the West, blogs have become an outlet for the rage that people are no longer allowed to express in the actual world. But, in India, with a booming and vibrant media, journalism without an editorial process is a dangerous trend. It’s easy to dismiss journalism as literature in a hurry, but blogging is just organised gossip.

I have no idea what the man is smoking but East or West, there will be a signal/noise ratio irrespective of location. The above text is proof of the crab like mentality that permeates the Indian mindset in general. He would cite glowing examples of western bloggers but cannot extend the same generosity to the tsunami, earthquake or anti blog-ban efforts by Indian bloggers. When it comes to Indian bloggers, suddenly, grammar and journalistic ideals become paramount.
——————————

*Call it coincidence but I had a minor debate with another person online about blogs and as to why people blog.

(I know this is more of a repetition, this is why I added it at the end. Please feel free to skip it.)

People blog for various reasons. There are no good blogs or bad blogs. Of course, the same reasoning cannot be extended to blogs that support Jihad or spread terror and such; you get the drift.

I hear this lament from pseudo-intellectuals who complain that the blogosphere is filled with nonsense: people writing personal stories or some kid writing about the latest pop-culture news item. But you see, that is the whole point of a blog.

Someone like Salman Rushdie or a 14 year old has access to the same technology and the means to create the same kind of impact via this vehicle known as a blog. How one does it is open and left to the creativity of the poster.

Once again, not everyone tries to create an impact, for some, it is therapeutic, it is a way for them to organize their thoughts and see themselves grow; an attempt to pour the ideas in their mind into a database located remotely on some hosting service somewhere in a portable format so that these thoughts don’t bother them and thereby create clarity, making them more focused on their immediate goals.

For some, blogs are the only hope outside their box and the oppression. They are powerful transmitters to the world. This oppression could be of any kind: self-inflicted, disease, or a government that curbs the freedom of its people.

Related:- [The party-pooper could not hold it any longer]- [Resilience or Apathy?]- [CBSE results on SMS]- [Do not cast pearls before a swine]- [Women in floral dresses]

Sleepwalking to Isolation

I read an extraordinary article in the Telegraph commenting on the aftermath of multiculturalism blinded by political correctness. What this article provided me was a desire to compare how far entrenched democracies namely, India, UK and the United States are today on the decay-scale. The reason I choose these three is simply because I am from India, the UK has a history with people from the subcontinent and US is a relatively young nation in terms of history.

Ray Honeyford, a former school teacher in the UK was vilified for his views on multiculturalism. Apparently, Honeyford had published his displeasure in a right wing journal named Salisbury Review. The disappearance of Muslim children to Bangladesh and Pakistan for months at a stretch on the pretext of promoting and learning culture had bothered him and he suggested that this was not the path for integration and it was defeatist in its goal of common platform creation education. He was also severely chastized for recommending that Muslim girls should be educated to an equal level*.

The torrent of dissent came from Mohammed Ajeeb, who was very vocal and framed Honeyford as a racist. The politically correct bandwagon rolled on and each passing year, pushed the Muslim community from Pakistan and Bangladesh into isolated ghettos.

It was not until 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings fuelled by British Citizenry did Azeeb admit that there was a problem with the isolationist trend. Twenty years later, Azeeb makes a grand ‘U’ turn to suggest that no more than 70% of the student population in any school should be of a single race. Such a comment was unthinkable just 5 years ago in the UK, US or surprise-of-surprises, in the Muslim community.

At this juncture, I would like to focus on segregation scale propagated by political correctness.

+—–*[USA]——*[UK]———————-*[India]—
——-> Isolation propagated by Political Correctness

The USA can take relief in the thought that the school diversity debate was not a lost cause afterall, maintaining a racial and ethnic balance although expensive might have saved it a lot of trouble as seen in France and UK. It has strict protocol when it comes to education and schools unlike the UK which was drunk on political correctness to allow the renaming of Honeyford’s Drummond Middle School to Iqra.

In comparison, I cannot fathom how far deep our institutions in India are submerged in this sort of leniancy towards isolationism and centers of hatred. We are already grappling with it as seen in Kerala and Bihar where school system administration and protocol is completely hijacked by people who have vested interests and connections with Saudia Arabia. Kerala is awash with funds from UAE which are offered as bribes to promote isolationism. SIMI and ISI have joined and are fannning the flames. We just heard the news that SIMI is under the scanner in Malegaon barely weeks after the Mumbai blasts.

Even in the current climate, Ray Honeyford would probably be shot dead on his way to buy his groceries or his evening walk had he lived in India. Such is the level of denial in folks back home. This is further fuelled by the politicians like Mulayam who have the audacity to declare (not even suggest) the religion of successors in publicly contested elections in a democracy.

The UK probably can breathe a sigh of relief as the incoming immigrants from Eastern Europe gravitate towards low cost housing and dilute the increasingly isolationist Muslim ghettos. India does not have that kind of luxury. The sooner we accept the problem the better it will be for us. Admitting the problem is a good first step.

There is hope in the UK as politicians are beginning to ask tough questions. What will happen to India considering that there are nearly 250 Million muslims in the country?

Over the recent years, since 9/11, thanks to technology, news and commentary in US, UK, and nations around the world reaches everywhere and it even reaches India. It is as if the cover has been removed off the moist and smelly decaying Indian mass to expose the level of gangrenous disarray and putridity that is consuming the nation.

—-

* A recent poll on BBC-SouthAsia suggested that 10% of the Muslim population (although, the PC term is SOuth Asian) approved of honor killing in the UK; yet another side-effect of turning a blind-eye towards indoctrination of radical ideas.

Related:- [NBC, CBS to offer shows on demand for 99 cents]- [The Unknown Superstar - Ayaan Hirsi Ali]

Protecting Israel Vs. War on Terror

A decade from now, when the dust has settled down around the war in Iraq, questions will be asked vociferously about the propriety of the Iraq war a la Vietnam, mostly through pop culture. The truth lies in the inescapable condition that we as civilians have no access to the real status and the motivations of those who chart the progress of the war in the present.

The number of American soldiers sacrificed in the Iraq war is nearing 2700, back in the days prior to 9/11, the death of an American soldier was met with heartbreak and mourning. These days, it is a given, the American populace is more or less immune to such news. We lead our orchestrated and predetermined lives at work as well as in real life, thanks to social engineering and media infrastructure that infringes upon your thought process and leads people to believe what they see and hear and worse, desensitize them to news that is otherwise gory and grave. The reasons for the war vary from:

  1. WMD;
  2. Saddam and terror links; and
  3. Promotion of democracy in Iraq to serve as a model for the Middle East.

One or all of the above are used in combinations that suits the purpose and context to justify the war.

It is not really clear to me as to what fuels US interest in the middle-east. Is the US involvement a case of helpless entanglement in the scheme of things? or is it a tactic to further US goals in the middle-east determined after the second world war?

The goals of the US after the Second World War were:

  1. Persian Gulf oil;
  2. Support and safety of Israel; and
  3. Containment of Communism.

As the US turned out to be the sole super power after the demise of Soviet Union, the third goal is largely a non issue today.

Considering US history in the Middle East in recent times, it is clear that “protecting Israel” and the “War on terror” are completely separate goals and are strategically mutually exclusive.

The attitude is clear in the administration’s handling of the issue of nuclear proliferation. It appears to me that in its role as Israel’s protector; ably backed by a very strong Jewish lobby, the administration has completely lost sight of what qualifies as terrorism as seen from the reaction meted out towards Iran in comparison to the administration’s reaction towards Pakistan.

The US reaction at Iran’s nuclear know-how is largely fuelled by Israel’s trepidation of a missile attack from Iran. Condoleezza Rice’s rope-walk/silence during the recent Israeli attack on Lebanon is proof of commitment of the US.

According to a Bush headed inspector in Iraq, David Kay, Iraq did not have WMD but evidence seemed to suggest that it had safeguarded the links and technical know-how just in case it had to restart the program after the sanctions are lifted. Kay discovered attempts to acquire missile technology from North Korea.

In the process, the main perpetrator of nuclear proliferation, Pakistan, via its links to nuclear know-how of North Korea and Iran is allowed to go scot-free. This is a terrible flaw in Bush’s “war on Terror.” This also highlights the strategy that the US wants to play the game in such a way that it maintains a hold in the Middle East, its oil, protect Israel and that all policy will be driven with this point of view.

In all the terrorist attacks since 9/11, a majority of the attackers had a direct or indirect links to terrorist bases in Pakistan. The relative silence and double standard in the media towards piling evidence against Pakistan is nothing short of startling considering that the administration uses the “War on Terror” rhetoric to the maximum effect in times of need.

Related:- [NY Terror Alert - Fact or Fiction?]- [The Osirak Reactor]- [Time to refocus!!]- [Tasha]- [The height of screwed up logic]